Explaining the DNA Data Sheet and DNA
Matrix November 2006
Working with the Data
The first thing to do is to print out this page (the one you are reading) so you can follow the instructions better.
The next thing to do is to copy and paste the data from file called:
DNA Patterns of Each Todd Family (25 families as of July 2006)
into an Excel Spreadsheet on your computer. Then, print it out on 11”x17” paper if you have a huge printer or in multiple 8-1/2” x 11” sheets that you paste together. This way you can really see the patterns of numbers.
Understanding the Data
Using The Data
For most researchers, the most important of the three data sheets is the one labeled:
DNA Patterns of Each Todd Family (25 families as of July 2006)
If you get a DNA sample for a male Todd descendant of a male Todd for your family, then all you have to do is compare those results with the 25 families on the spreadsheet and you will know which family you share a common ancestor with.
To simplify the comparison, you can either look at the numbers corresponding to DNA Marker 464a-464b-464c-464d (see the numbers along the very top of the spreadsheet) or the markers 385-1 and 385-2 and 398-1 and 398-2. Only one or two of the major family groups has the same pattern for these markers, so making this comparison narrows down the number of families you have to make a column by column comparison to.
|
464a |
464b |
464c |
464d |
Hanover
Twp, Lancaster Co related Todds |
11 |
14 |
14 |
15 |
Mary Todd Lincoln Dominant Pattern |
12 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
James
Todd d 1772 East Nottingham Twp Chester Co, PA |
12 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
Joseph
Todd 1742-1809 Ontario Co. NY |
12 |
12 |
14 |
16 |
Somerset
Co NJ Todds |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
John
Todd 1621-1689/1690 Yorkshire, |
14 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
Samuel
Todd b 1802 GA d IL |
14 |
15 |
15 |
16 |
Thomas
Todd d 1677 |
15 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
Cornelius
Todd d 1750 Northumberland Co, VA |
15 |
15 |
17 |
17 |
William
Todd d 1769 Bertie Co. NC |
15 |
15 |
17 |
18 |
Elial Todd 1810 d pr 1860 England Detroit |
15 |
15 |
17 |
18 |
John
Todd 1754-1819 Washington Co, PA |
15 |
16 |
16 |
17 |
Joseph
Todd d 1699 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
17 |
William
(c1815 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
17 |
William
Todd d 1802 |
15 |
16 |
16 |
17 |
John
Todd b c 1690 d 1775 Chester Co, |
16 |
17 |
17 |
17 |
Thomas
Todd d1671 Anne Arundel Co |
17 |
17 |
19 |
19 |
Michael
Todd d 1730 Dorchester Co. |
17 |
17 |
17 |
19 |
Or you can do the same thing to narrow down the families you have to compare number by number by comparing the values for the markers of your sample with the markers of the families using Markers 385-a, 385-b, 398-a, 398-b. What is special about using these markers is that these are available using only the $99 DNA test from Family Tree DNA.
First, you look at the pattern of your sample for the four blue highlighted markers 385a-b and 389-1, 389-2. For most cases, these four markers will define the matching family. But for some families, there are 2 to 4 families with the same pattern for the four markers. For these families, you will see that within the 12 markers there is one marker highlighted with yellow. Those markers distinguish the particular family. If your family matches both the four blue highlighted and the one yellow highlighted markers, that is the family that shares a common ancestor with your family.
|
|
<-----------First
12 Markers----------------------> |
|||||||||||
|
Family |
1 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
|
|
9 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
5 |
8 |
9 |
9 |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
6 |
9 |
|
|
|
a |
b |
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: FTDNA value of 10 at DYS GATA-H4 is
equivalent to an 11 within the DNA Heritage System |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
John
Todd b c 1690 d 1775 Chester Co, |
14 |
10 |
14 |
12 |
13 |
28 |
|
11 |
14 |
|
13 |
13 |
12 |
Michael
Todd d 1730 Dorchester Co. |
14 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
28 |
23 |
10 |
13 |
13 |
12 |
13 |
17 |
Joseph
Todd d 1699 |
14 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
13 |
28 |
24 |
11 |
13 |
13 |
12 |
11 |
16 |
John
Todd 1754-1819 Washington Co, PA |
14 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
13 |
29 |
24 |
11 |
15 |
13 |
12 |
11 |
21 |
Elial Todd 1810 d pr 1860 England Detroit |
14 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
13 |
29 |
23 |
11 |
14 |
|
12 |
12 |
22 |
William
Todd d 1802 |
14 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
13 |
29 |
24 |
11 |
13 |
13 |
12 |
16 |
24 |
William
(c1815 |
14 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
13 |
29 |
24 |
10 |
13 |
13 |
12 |
15 |
13 |
Thomas
Todd d 1677 |
14 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
13 |
30 |
24 |
11 |
13 |
|
12 |
12 |
18 |
James
Todd d 1772 East Nottingham Twp Chester Co, PA |
16 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
13 |
30 |
25 |
10 |
11 |
|
12 |
11 |
19 |
Cornelius
Todd d 1750 Northumberland Co, VA |
14 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
13 |
31 |
|
10 |
13 |
|
12 |
12 |
7 |
William
Todd d 1769 Bertie Co. NC |
14 |
11 |
15 |
12 |
13 |
29 |
24 |
11 |
13 |
|
12 |
12 |
8 |
Lancelot
1674-1735 Lancelot d
1715 Nathan abt 1720
John d 1809/10 |
14 |
11 |
15 |
12 |
13 |
29 |
25 |
10 |
13 |
13 |
12 |
12 |
9 |
Lancelot
1674-1735 Lancelot d
1715 Nathan abt 1720
Benjamin 1749-1823 |
14 |
11 |
15 |
12 |
13 |
29 |
24 |
10 |
13 |
13 |
12 |
12 |
10 |
Thomas
d 1671 Thomas d
1677 Lancelot Todd d
1735 Lancelot 1715-1791 Thomas 1742-1808 |
14 |
11 |
15 |
12 |
13 |
29 |
24 |
10 |
13 |
13 |
12 |
12 |
14 |
Hanover
Twp, Lancaster Co related Todds |
15 |
12 |
15 |
15 |
14 |
30 |
23 |
10 |
11 |
|
11 |
12 |
20 |
Samuel
Todd b 1802 GA
d IL |
13 |
13 |
13 |
12 |
13 |
29 |
22 |
10 |
15 |
|
12 |
12 |
6 |
Joseph
Todd 1742-1809 Ontario Co. NY |
14 |
13 |
14 |
14 |
12 |
28 |
22 |
10 |
11 |
|
11 |
11 |
25 |
John
Todd 1804 NY md 1826 NJ d 1869 Livingston Co, MI |
11 |
14 |
12 |
13 |
29 |
|
11 |
13 |
|
12 |
15 |
|
1 |
Mary Todd Lincoln Dominant Pattern |
14 |
14 |
14 |
13 |
12 |
28 |
23 |
10 |
11 |
13 |
11 |
11 |
2 |
Andrew Todd d 1791 Louisa
Co. VA |
14 |
14 |
14 |
13 |
12 |
28 |
23 |
10 |
11 |
13 |
11 |
11 |
3 |
Somerset
Co NJ Todds |
14 |
14 |
14 |
14 |
12 |
28 |
23 |
10 |
11 |
|
11 |
11 |
4 |
Somerset
Co NJ Todds |
14 |
14 |
14 |
14 |
12 |
28 |
23 |
10 |
11 |
|
11 |
11 |
5 |
OtherImmigrant Todds
with similar NJ Signautre |
14 |
14 |
14 |
14 |
12 |
29 |
23 |
10 |
11 |
13 |
11 |
11 |
23 |
John
Todd 1621-1689/1690 Yorkshire, |
15 |
14 |
17 |
13 |
12 |
28 |
24 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
11 |
15 |
Once you narrowed down your search to a smaller number of families, you can go back to spreadsheet you printed out for the
DNA Patterns of Each Todd Family (25 families as of July 2006)
Find the families that have the same 464a-d pattern and the same 385/389 pattern and then compare each of your DNA values with the values in each column corresponding to the families of interest. Count the number of differences between your test numbers and the families test numbers. If the differences are 0 to 2, then you share a common ancestor with that family. If the differences are more than 5, then you are not related.
The Detailed Data
The detailed data as of November 2006 consists of the DNA results contained in the file:
Todd DNA Data Spreadsheet
It contains 80+ individuals in 10 major family groups along with 7 unrelated individuals.
Each person donating a DNA sample or each family is listed on a separate row of the spreadsheet. Across the top of the spreadsheet are column headings that correspond to each of the 48 DNA markers that define a given sample. For example, column headings: 19, 390, 391, CDYa, GATHA1, all correspond to a given DNA marker.
The first row of the spreadsheet has a 14 in the first column labeled “19”. So that means that Marker 19 for the first sample has a value of “14”. There is a “14” In the second column on the first row of numbers with a column heading labeled “385a”. So that means that Marker 385a has a value of “14”. If you go down the matrix you will find that some entries in the column for Marker 19 has a 14 and others have a 15 or 16. The differences in these numbers for all the columns is how we tell whether individuals or families share a common ancestor or not.
The various colored highlight is used to show the dominant DNA pattern that corresponds to the family pattern and the yellow highlights show the markers that differ from the dominant pattern for the samples from individuals thought to be closely relate. When you see only one or two yellow highlighted boxes, then these individuals are close enough to be sure that they share a common ancestor. When you see 5 or more yellow highlighted boxes, you know they are not related to the individual with the dominant pattern.
The ten major groups are:
The families represented by single individuals include:
The Matrix
The DNA matrix shows the degree of genetic distance between each family of the DNA project. Individuals with exact matches (yellow zeros) or 1 or 2 mutations (green highlight) are most definitely close relatives. Individuals with 5 or more are probably most definitely not related. In between is a fuzzy area where genealogical research is needed to establish connection or lack thereof.